No I did NOT smoke pot. I wasn't even present around people smoking pot until fairly recently, and exposure just strengthened my opinion that drugs should be legalized. This support is what guarantees I won't be seen as a viable candidate for any government office. (Anti drug law being used as the reason we need the massive police presence in our lives... Have to win the war on drugs you see...)
Brad Pitt has recently come under fire for being a drug user. I don't support people wasting their lives (and money) on drugs, though I hardly think that Brad can be described as a burnout.
That being said, I don't understand where precisely, the Constitution permits the outlaw of ingestion of certain substances... It certainly didn't allow for the outlaw of alchohol, hence the passage and repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment. Yet suddenly the government decided that they could hide anything under the "interstate commerce" clause. This is one of the most pernicious uses of law in the history of man. The interstate commerce clause is now used for laws governing production of food products inside state lines, firearm production sales and possession, drugs, minimum wage laws just to name a few.
Drug law is the basis for most of the police state policies we currently have, and will likely be the pretext used when it comes time to arrest and imprison anyone who speaks out against the current administration.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment